animation: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.61
, medium
Weight: 0.60
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, design
Weight: 0.57
Siblings shrek
Weight: 0.62
, photography
Weight: 0.33
, cinema
Weight: 0.33
, editing
Weight: 0.33
, comic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality standard 0.83
is great 0.81
has quality compare 0.81
has quality joke 0.79
is bad now 0.78
is good job 0.77
be considered good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(design, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(animation, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(medium, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(animation, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(design, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(animation, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(industry, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(animation, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(medium, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(animation, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(medium, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(medium, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(design, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(industry, has quality standard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(design, be considered good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(medium, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(design, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(medium, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(design, be considered good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(industry, has quality standard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(shrek, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cinema, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shrek, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, is great)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(shrek, is great)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(photography, is good job)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(shrek, has quality joke)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(editing, has quality compare)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(design, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(animation, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(medium, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(animation, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(medium, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(animation, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(industry, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(animation, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(design, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(animation, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(shrek, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(shrek, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cinema, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cinema, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(photography, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(shrek, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(shrek, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(editing, has quality compare) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(editing, has quality compare)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(shrek, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(shrek, is great)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(photography, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(photography, is great)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(shrek, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shrek, has quality joke)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(photography, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(photography, is good job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(animation, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(animation, has quality bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(animation, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(animation, is quality)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(animation, is quality)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(animation, is quality)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(animation, is bad now)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(animation, is bad now)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(animation, is bad now)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(animation, is bad now)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(animation, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(medium, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(industry, has quality standard)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(medium, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(design, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(design, be considered good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(shrek, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(editing, has quality compare)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(shrek, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cinema, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photography, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(shrek, is great)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(shrek, has quality joke)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is great)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is good job)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(medium, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(design, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(medium, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(industry, has quality standard)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(animation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(design, be considered good)