attention: be important for language

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consideration
Weight: 0.64
, experience
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, gift
Weight: 0.57
Siblings mind
Weight: 0.32
, support
Weight: 0.31
, care
Weight: 0.31
, concern
Weight: 0.31
, excitement
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for language 1.00
be important for language development 0.92
be important for learning 0.79
be important to organisation 0.77
be important in writing 0.77
be important in teaching 0.75
be important in education 0.75
be important for system 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(topic, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(attention, be important for language)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(resource, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(attention, be important for language)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(experience, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(attention, be important for language)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(experience, be important in teaching)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(resource, be important to organisation)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(topic, be important in writing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(experience, be important in teaching)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topic, be important in writing)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to organisation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(topic, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(attention, be important for language)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(resource, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(attention, be important for language)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(experience, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(attention, be important for language)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(attention, be important for language)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for language development)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(attention, be important for language development)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for learning)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for system)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(attention, be important for system)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(attention, be important for learning)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(attention, be important for system)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(attention, be important for language development)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(attention, be important for system)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(attention, be important for learning)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(attention, be important for learning)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(attention, be important for language development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for language)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(attention, be important for language)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(resource, be important to organisation)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(experience, be important in teaching)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(topic, be important in writing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(resource, be important to organisation)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(experience, be important in teaching)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(attention, be important for language)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(topic, be important in writing)