attorney: be in uk wear wigs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents defense attorney
Weight: 0.74
, agent
Weight: 0.62
, office
Weight: 0.62
, witness
Weight: 0.61
Siblings partner
Weight: 0.65
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.62
, associate
Weight: 0.59
, paralegal
Weight: 0.57
, solicitor
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in uk wear wigs 1.00
be in england wear wigs 0.92
wear wigs in england 0.92
wear wigs 0.92
wear white wigs 0.91
wear wigs in court 0.88
wear hair 0.81
wear long hair 0.79
is expensive uk 0.79
is uk 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, wear wigs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, is expensive uk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, is uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(solicitor, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(prosecutor, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(prosecutor, wear wigs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(solicitor, is uk)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(solicitor, is uk)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(solicitor, is expensive uk)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(solicitor, is expensive uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(attorney, be in england wear wigs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in england wear wigs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(attorney, be in england wear wigs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in england)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(attorney, wear wigs in england)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(attorney, wear wigs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in england)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear wigs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(attorney, wear wigs in court)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(attorney, be in england wear wigs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(attorney, wear wigs in court)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(attorney, wear wigs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(attorney, wear wigs in england)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(attorney, wear hair)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear long hair)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear hair)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear hair)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(attorney, wear hair)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(attorney, wear white wigs)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(attorney, wear long hair)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(attorney, wear white wigs)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear long hair)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(attorney, wear long hair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(prosecutor, wear wigs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(solicitor, is uk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(solicitor, is expensive uk)