automatic: be less efficient fuel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents application
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, option
Weight: 0.47
, club
Weight: 0.47
, system
Weight: 0.45
Siblings automatic transmission
Weight: 0.33
, time machine
Weight: 0.31
, attachment
Weight: 0.30
, defense system
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be less efficient fuel 1.00
use more fuel 0.91
use fuel 0.87
be less efficient than manual 0.87
use more fuel than manuals 0.80
get better gas mileage 0.80
is more expensive 0.79
get gas mileage 0.77
is cheaper 0.76
be more expensive than manual 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(automatic, be less efficient fuel)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(option, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(option, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(automatic, be less efficient fuel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(automatic, be less efficient fuel)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(automatic, use fuel)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(automatic, use fuel)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(automatic, use more fuel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(automatic, be less efficient than manual)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(automatic, use more fuel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(automatic, use fuel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(automatic, be less efficient than manual)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(automatic, use more fuel than manuals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(automatic, use more fuel)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(automatic, get gas mileage)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(automatic, be less efficient than manual)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(automatic, use more fuel)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(automatic, use more fuel than manuals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient than manual)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(automatic, get better gas mileage)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(automatic, get gas mileage)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(automatic, get better gas mileage)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(automatic, get gas mileage)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(automatic, get gas mileage)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(automatic, is cheaper)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(automatic, get better gas mileage)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(automatic, is more expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(automatic, is cheaper)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(automatic, use more fuel than manuals)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(automatic, get better gas mileage)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(automatic, is cheaper)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(automatic, use more fuel than manuals)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(automatic, use fuel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(automatic, be less efficient fuel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(automatic, be less efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)