automatic: is cheaper

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents application
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, option
Weight: 0.47
, club
Weight: 0.47
, system
Weight: 0.45
Siblings automatic transmission
Weight: 0.33
, time machine
Weight: 0.31
, attachment
Weight: 0.30
, defense system
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cheaper 1.00
is more expensive 0.86
is expensive 0.85
be more expensive than manual 0.76
be less efficient fuel 0.76
be more expensive to tax 0.76
be less efficient than manual 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(automatic, is cheaper)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(automatic, is cheaper)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(automatic, is cheaper)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(automatic, is cheaper)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(option, is cheaper)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(application, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(option, is cheaper)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(automatic, is cheaper)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(automatic, is cheaper)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(automatic, is cheaper)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(automatic, is cheaper)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(automatic, is cheaper)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(automatic, is more expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(automatic, is expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(automatic, is more expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(automatic, be less efficient fuel)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(automatic, be less efficient than manual)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive to tax)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(automatic, be less efficient fuel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(automatic, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(automatic, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(automatic, be less efficient fuel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(automatic, be less efficient than manual)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(automatic, be less efficient than manual)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient fuel)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient than manual)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(automatic, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(automatic, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)