bat: be at forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.65
, wild animal
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, enemy
Weight: 0.60
, player
Weight: 0.58
Siblings vampire bat
Weight: 0.73
, baseball player
Weight: 0.34
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34
, baseball game
Weight: 0.34
, monkey
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at forest 1.00
be at tropical forest 0.88
be at rain forest 0.88
be at zoo or tropical forest 0.86
be defined as animal which live in forest 0.85
be at indian forest 0.83
be at rainforest 0.82
be at it natural habitat 0.77
be at costa rican forest 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(bat, be at forest)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(bat, be at forest)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(bat, be at forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at costa rican forest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at indian forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at rainforest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bat, be at forest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bat, be at forest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bat, be at forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(tree frog, be at forest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(monkey, be at indian forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at indian forest)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at rainforest)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(monkey, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(monkey, be at costa rican forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at costa rican forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(bat, be at forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(bat, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(tree frog, be at forest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(monkey, be at rainforest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(monkey, be at indian forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(monkey, be at costa rican forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(bat, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)