book: be better than tv

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cookbook
Weight: 0.70
, good book
Weight: 0.69
, read
Weight: 0.63
, artifact
Weight: 0.63
Siblings reading book
Weight: 0.79
, phone book
Weight: 0.78
, blue book
Weight: 0.76
, math book
Weight: 0.74
, autobiography
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than tv 1.00
be better than television 0.90
be better than internet 0.84
be better than playaways 0.84
be better than movies 0.84
be more wholesome than tv 0.83
be better than movie 0.83
be considered better than movies 0.81
be better than computer 0.81
is better then movies 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(reading book, be better than television)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(reading book, be better than television)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(book, be better than tv)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(book, be better than television)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(book, be better than television)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than television)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(book, be better than movies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(book, be better than movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(book, be better than movie)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(book, be better than computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(book, be better than movie)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(book, be better than movie)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(book, be better than movie)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(book, be better than computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than movie)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than movie)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(book, be better than television)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than computer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(book, be better than movies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(book, be better than computer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(book, be better than internet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(book, be better than internet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(book, be better than movie)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(book, be better than movie)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(book, be better than internet)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than internet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(book, be better than playaways)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(book, be better than playaways)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than playaways)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(book, be better than playaways)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than tv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(book, be better than tv)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(reading book, be better than television)