book: be better watching

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cookbook
Weight: 0.70
, good book
Weight: 0.69
, read
Weight: 0.63
, artifact
Weight: 0.63
Siblings reading book
Weight: 0.79
, phone book
Weight: 0.78
, blue book
Weight: 0.76
, math book
Weight: 0.74
, autobiography
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better watching 1.00
be better watching before 0.97
watching before movie 0.88
be better than television 0.79
be better than tv 0.78
is better then movies 0.78
be better than movies 0.77
be better than playaways 0.77
be considered better than movies 0.76
is better movies 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(reading book, watching before movie)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(reading book, be better than television)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(reading book, be better watching)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(reading book, be better watching before)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(reading book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(reading book, be better watching)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(reading book, watching before movie)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(reading book, watching before movie)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(reading book, be better watching before)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(reading book, be better watching before)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(reading book, be better than television)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(book, be better watching)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(book, be better than television)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(book, be better than television)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(book, be better than tv)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(book, be better than tv)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(book, be better than movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than television)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(book, be better than movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than tv)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than movies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(book, be better than television)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(book, be better than movies)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(book, be better than tv)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(book, be better than playaways)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(book, be better than playaways)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(book, be better than playaways)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than playaways)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(book, be better watching)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(book, be better watching)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(reading book, watching before movie)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(reading book, be better than television)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(reading book, be better watching)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(reading book, be better watching before)