bowl: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents form
Weight: 0.62
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
Siblings toilet bowl
Weight: 0.60
, cup
Weight: 0.59
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34
, frying pan
Weight: 0.32
, ladle
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality full 0.84
CAN good 0.81
has quality price 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cup, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cup, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cup, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(cup, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cup, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(bowl, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(bowl, has quality price)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bowl, has quality price)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bowl, has quality price)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bowl, has quality price)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bowl, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bowl, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cup, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cup, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cup, has quality better)