cup: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents container
Weight: 0.69
, item
Weight: 0.61
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.60
, bowl
Weight: 0.59
Siblings coffee cup
Weight: 0.73
, ramekin
Weight: 0.37
, jug
Weight: 0.35
, coffee mug
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality full 0.84
has quality price 0.80
be bad for environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cup, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bowl, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cup, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cup, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(bowl, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(container, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bowl, has quality price)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(container, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bowl, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bowl, has quality price)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(coffee cup, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coffee cup, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bowl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cup, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cup, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bowl, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cup, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(coffee cup, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(coffee cup, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(coffee cup, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(coffee cup, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cup, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(cup, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cup, has quality better)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cup, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cup, has quality better)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cup, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cup, has quality better)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cup, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bowl, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bowl, has quality price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(coffee cup, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(coffee cup, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bowl, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bowl, has quality price)