cup: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents container
Weight: 0.69
, item
Weight: 0.61
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.60
, bowl
Weight: 0.59
Siblings coffee cup
Weight: 0.73
, ramekin
Weight: 0.37
, jug
Weight: 0.35
, coffee mug
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
has quality full 0.83
has quality price 0.79
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bowl, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cup, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cup, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bowl, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cup, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cup, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(container, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(bowl, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bowl, has quality price)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(container, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bowl, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bowl, has quality price)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(coffee cup, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bowl, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cup, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cup, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cup, has quality better)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bowl, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cup, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(coffee cup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(coffee cup, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cup, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cup, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cup, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(cup, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cup, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cup, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cup, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cup, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bowl, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bowl, has quality price)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(coffee cup, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bowl, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bowl, has quality price)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)