bribery: has quality wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.60
, charge
Weight: 0.60
, crime
Weight: 0.58
, practice
Weight: 0.57
, felony
Weight: 0.57
Siblings corruption
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, perjury
Weight: 0.33
, money laundering
Weight: 0.33
, conspiracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wrong 1.00
has quality bad 0.87
has quality good 0.85
is ethically wrong 0.79
has quality question 0.76
is right now 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality wrong)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality wrong)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality wrong)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(felony, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality wrong)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(felony, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(felony, has quality question)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(felony, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(felony, has quality question)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(felony, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(perjury, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(money laundering, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(bribery, has quality wrong)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(bribery, has quality wrong)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(bribery, has quality wrong)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(felony, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(bribery, has quality wrong)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(felony, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(bribery, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(money laundering, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(money laundering, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(perjury, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(perjury, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(bribery, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(bribery, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(bribery, is ethically wrong)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(felony, has quality question)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(felony, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(corruption, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(perjury, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(money laundering, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(felony, has quality question)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(felony, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(bribery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)