bribery: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.60
, charge
Weight: 0.60
, crime
Weight: 0.58
, practice
Weight: 0.57
, felony
Weight: 0.57
Siblings corruption
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, perjury
Weight: 0.33
, money laundering
Weight: 0.33
, conspiracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality wrong 0.87
get bad 0.83
affect quality 0.81
be bad for business 0.80
affect quality of life 0.79
be good for business 0.76
has quality question 0.76
was bad during great depression 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(felony, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(felony, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(felony, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(felony, has quality question)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(crime, affect quality of life)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(practice, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(felony, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(felony, has quality question)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(practice, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(perjury, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(money laundering, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(felony, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(felony, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(money laundering, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(money laundering, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(perjury, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(perjury, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(bribery, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality wrong)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(bribery, be bad for business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(bribery, has quality wrong)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, be bad for business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(bribery, has quality wrong)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(felony, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(felony, has quality question)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(corruption, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(perjury, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(money laundering, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(corruption, be bad for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(felony, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(felony, has quality question)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)