corruption: be bad for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for business 1.00
be bad for economy 0.84
get bad 0.84
affect business in community 0.82
be bad for environment 0.82
take place in business 0.82
affect business environment 0.81
be good for economy 0.81
has quality bad 0.80
is bad thing 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(corruption, be bad for business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(corruption, be bad for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect business in community)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fraud, take place in business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(hypocrisy, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hypocrisy, is bad thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hypocrisy, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(hypocrisy, is bad thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fraud, take place in business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(poverty, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(hypocrisy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hypocrisy, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(terrorism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(terrorism, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(poverty, affect business in community)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(poverty, affect business in community)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(corruption, be bad for business)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(corruption, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(corruption, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(corruption, be bad for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, be bad for business)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fraud, take place in business)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(hypocrisy, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hypocrisy, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(terrorism, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(poverty, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(poverty, affect business in community)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)