bribery: be bad for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.60
, charge
Weight: 0.60
, crime
Weight: 0.58
, practice
Weight: 0.57
, felony
Weight: 0.57
Siblings corruption
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, perjury
Weight: 0.33
, money laundering
Weight: 0.33
, conspiracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for business 1.00
be good for business 0.96
be important in business 0.89
affect on business 0.86
affect business 0.86
be bad for economy 0.84
get bad 0.84
take place in business 0.82
has quality bad 0.80
be for businesses 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, be bad for business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, be bad for business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(issue, be for businesses)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, be bad for business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(practice, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, be bad for business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, be bad for business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, be bad for business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(felony, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, be bad for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(felony, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(practice, be good for business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(practice, be important in business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(issue, be for businesses)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(issue, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(practice, be good for business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(practice, be important in business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important in business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(felony, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, be for businesses)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fraud, take place in business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(perjury, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(money laundering, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(practice, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(issue, be for businesses)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(felony, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fraud, take place in business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(money laundering, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(money laundering, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(perjury, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(perjury, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(bribery, be bad for business)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(bribery, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, be bad for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(practice, be important in business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(felony, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(issue, be for businesses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(corruption, be bad for business)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fraud, take place in business)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(corruption, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(perjury, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(money laundering, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(felony, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(practice, be important in business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(issue, be for businesses)