buffet: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.56
, furniture
Weight: 0.55
, option
Weight: 0.54
, restaurant
Weight: 0.51
Siblings dining table
Weight: 0.34
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.34
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is cheap 0.79
be expensive in uk 0.78
be expensive in norway 0.78
be much more expensive in nyc 0.78
be expensive in usa 0.76
be expensive in canada 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(buffet, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(furniture, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(buffet, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(buffet, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(furniture, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(buffet, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(furniture, be expensive in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(buffet, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(buffet, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(furniture, be expensive in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(buffet, is expensive)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(furniture, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(buffet, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(furniture, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(furniture, is cheap)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(furniture, be expensive in uk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(furniture, be expensive in canada)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(furniture, be expensive in usa)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(furniture, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(furniture, be expensive in canada)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(furniture, be expensive in uk)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(furniture, is cheap)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(furniture, be expensive in usa)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(buffet, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(furniture, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(buffet, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(buffet, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(furniture, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(buffet, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(furniture, be expensive in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(buffet, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(buffet, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(furniture, be expensive in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(buffet, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(furniture, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(buffet, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dining table, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(steakhouse, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(italian restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(buffet, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(buffet, is cheap)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(buffet, is cheap)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(buffet, is cheap)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(buffet, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(furniture, be expensive in canada)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(furniture, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(furniture, be expensive in usa)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(furniture, be expensive in uk)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(furniture, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(steakhouse, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dining table, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(furniture, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(furniture, is cheap)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(furniture, be expensive in uk)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(furniture, be expensive in usa)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(buffet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(furniture, be expensive in canada)