burning: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, practice
Weight: 0.58
, accident
Weight: 0.57
, discomfort
Weight: 0.57
Siblings explosion
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.32
, campfire
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality wrong 0.87
has quality change 0.86
be bad for environment 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
affect water quality 0.78
be good for business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(burning, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(burning, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(burning, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(burning, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(practice, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(practice, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality change)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(burning, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(burning, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(burning, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(burning, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(explosion, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(explosion, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(explosion, has quality change)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(combustion, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(combustion, has quality change)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(burning, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(burning, has quality good)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(burning, has quality good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(burning, has quality good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(burning, has quality change)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(burning, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(explosion, has quality change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(explosion, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(combustion, has quality change)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(campfire, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(combustion, has quality bad)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(burning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)