burning: has quality change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, practice
Weight: 0.58
, accident
Weight: 0.57
, discomfort
Weight: 0.57
Siblings explosion
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.32
, campfire
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality change 1.00
has quality good 0.86
has quality bad 0.86
is physical change 0.84
become change 0.82
be considered change 0.81
be irreversible change change 0.78
affect water quality 0.78
cause climate change 0.77
is chemical change 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(burning, has quality change)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(burning, has quality change)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(burning, has quality change)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(activity, cause climate change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(burning, has quality change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(activity, cause climate change)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(activity, cause climate change)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality change)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality change)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(explosion, be considered change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(combustion, is chemical change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is chemical change)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(burning, has quality change)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(burning, has quality change)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(burning, has quality change)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(activity, cause climate change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(burning, has quality change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(explosion, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(explosion, has quality change)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(combustion, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(combustion, has quality change)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(explosion, be considered change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(explosion, be considered change)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(explosion, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(explosion, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(explosion, is chemical change)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(combustion, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(combustion, is chemical change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(burning, has quality change)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(burning, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(burning, be considered change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(burning, be considered change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(burning, is physical change)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(burning, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(burning, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(burning, is chemical change)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(burning, be considered change)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(burning, be irreversible change change)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(burning, is physical change)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(burning, be considered change)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(burning, is physical change)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(burning, be irreversible change change)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(burning, be irreversible change change)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(burning, be irreversible change change)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(burning, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(burning, is chemical change)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(burning, is chemical change)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(burning, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(burning, is physical change)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(burning, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(burning, is chemical change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(burning, has quality change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(activity, cause climate change)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(explosion, has quality change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(explosion, be considered change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(explosion, is chemical change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(combustion, has quality change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(combustion, is chemical change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(explosion, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(combustion, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(activity, cause climate change)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(burning, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)