calorimeter: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.58
, device
Weight: 0.53
, equipment
Weight: 0.46
, product
Weight: 0.37
Siblings spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.35
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.34
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.33
, thermistor
Weight: 0.33
, electronic device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
is high quality 0.86
has quality system 0.84
has quality cost 0.82
is higher quality 0.80
has quality availability 0.78
has quality function 0.78
be good for 10 years 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, be good for 10 years)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(galvanometer, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality function)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(calorimeter, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(calorimeter, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(galvanometer, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(galvanometer, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(smoke detector, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality function)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(smoke detector, be good for 10 years)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(smoke detector, be good for 10 years)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(calorimeter, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality system)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(calorimeter, has quality system)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(calorimeter, has quality system)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(smoke detector, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(galvanometer, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(smoke detector, be good for 10 years)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality function)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(calorimeter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)