calorimeter: has quality system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.58
, device
Weight: 0.53
, equipment
Weight: 0.46
, product
Weight: 0.37
Siblings spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.35
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.34
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.33
, thermistor
Weight: 0.33
, electronic device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality system 1.00
is quality 0.86
has quality good 0.84
has quality cost 0.83
has quality function 0.82
has quality bad 0.82
is high quality 0.82
need systems 0.80
be important to computer system 0.79
has quality availability 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality system)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality system)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(device, be important to computer system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(instrument, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality function)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(galvanometer, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, need systems)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(calorimeter, has quality system)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(calorimeter, has quality system)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(calorimeter, has quality system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(electronic device, need systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(electronic device, need systems)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(galvanometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(galvanometer, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality function)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(smoke detector, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(calorimeter, has quality system)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(calorimeter, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(calorimeter, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(device, be important to computer system)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(electronic device, need systems)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(smoke detector, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(galvanometer, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality function)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(device, be important to computer system)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)