spectrophotometer: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.69
, device
Weight: 0.55
, apparatus
Weight: 0.53
, equipment
Weight: 0.53
, detector
Weight: 0.49
Siblings colorimeter
Weight: 0.37
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.35
, calorimeter
Weight: 0.35
, laser
Weight: 0.35
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality better 0.94
has quality worth 0.85
has quality system 0.84
has quality price 0.80
has quality function 0.78
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(detector, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(apparatus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(detector, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(apparatus, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(detector, has quality price)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(detector, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(apparatus, has quality function)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(instrument, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has quality worth)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(detector, has quality price)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has quality function)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(detector, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(galvanometer, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(galvanometer, has quality questions)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(detector, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(apparatus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(detector, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(galvanometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(galvanometer, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(calorimeter, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(calorimeter, has quality system)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(galvanometer, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(galvanometer, has quality questions)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(calorimeter, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(calorimeter, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(spectrophotometer, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(spectrophotometer, has quality function)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality function)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality function)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality function)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(apparatus, has quality worth)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(detector, has quality questions)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(apparatus, has quality function)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(detector, has quality price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(galvanometer, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(galvanometer, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality system)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(calorimeter, has quality questions)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(apparatus, has quality worth)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(detector, has quality price)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(apparatus, has quality function)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(spectrophotometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(detector, has quality questions)