camel: have padded feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have padded feet 1.00
have large feet 0.81
have big feet 0.81
have two feet 0.81
have flat feet 0.81
need feet 0.80
have fat feet 0.80
have large flat feet 0.80
have wide feet 0.78
have flat wide feet 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(camel, have padded feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(elephant, have flat feet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(camel, have padded feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(elephant, have big feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(camel, have padded feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(elephant, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(elephant, have big feet)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(camel, have padded feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(elephant, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(elephant, have flat feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(camel, have padded feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(camel, have padded feet)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(camel, have padded feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(camel, have flat feet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(camel, have padded feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(camel, have flat feet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(camel, have padded feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(camel, have flat feet)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(camel, have padded feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(camel, have big feet)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(camel, have padded feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(camel, have flat feet)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(camel, have padded feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(camel, have padded feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(camel, have padded feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(camel, have padded feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(camel, have padded feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(camel, have padded feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(elephant, have flat feet)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(camel, have padded feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(elephant, have big feet)