campsite: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.63
, location
Weight: 0.62
, facility
Weight: 0.56
, accommodation
Weight: 0.53
Siblings campground
Weight: 0.36
, park
Weight: 0.34
, hut
Weight: 0.34
, central park
Weight: 0.34
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
has quality bad 0.82
quality 0.81
has quality wrong 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(campsite, has quality worth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(location, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(campsite, has quality worth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(accommodation, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(campsite, has quality worth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(campsite, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(accommodation, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(accommodation, quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(location, has quality wrong)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(location, has quality wrong)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(campsite, has quality worth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(accommodation, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(campsite, has quality worth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(campsite, has quality worth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(location, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(campsite, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(park, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(campsite, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(campsite, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(campsite, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(accommodation, quality)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(location, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(park, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(accommodation, quality)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(campsite, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(location, has quality wrong)