capacity: plan important to organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.68
, value
Weight: 0.64
, quality
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings liter
Weight: 0.55
, power plant
Weight: 0.35
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.34
, power line
Weight: 0.33
, throughput
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
plan important to organization 1.00
be important to organization 0.90
be important in organization 0.90
be important for organizations 0.80
be important for leadership 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(value, be important for organizations)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(capacity, plan important to organization)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(value, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(capacity, plan important to organization)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(quality, be important for leadership)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(capacity, plan important to organization)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(capacity, plan important to organization)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, be important to organization)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(value, be important in organization)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(value, be important for organizations)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(quality, be important for leadership)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(quality, be important to organization)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(value, be important in organization)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(value, be important for organizations)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(quality, be important for leadership)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(value, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(capacity, plan important to organization)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(value, be important for organizations)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(capacity, plan important to organization)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(capacity, plan important to organization)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(quality, be important for leadership)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(capacity, plan important to organization)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(capacity, plan important to organization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(capacity, plan important to organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(capacity, plan important to organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(quality, be important to organization)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(value, be important in organization)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(value, be important for organizations)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(quality, be important for leadership)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(quality, be important to organization)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(value, be important in organization)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(value, be important for organizations)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(capacity, plan important to organization)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(quality, be important for leadership)