caucus: has quality function

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gathering
Weight: 0.48
, meeting
Weight: 0.45
, bill
Weight: 0.43
, term
Weight: 0.39
, work
Weight: 0.38
Siblings birthday party
Weight: 0.31
, convention
Weight: 0.31
, forum
Weight: 0.30
, retreat
Weight: 0.29
, conference
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality function 1.00
has quality system 0.82
is originally function 0.81
has quality good 0.78
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality function)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality function)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality function)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(term, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality function)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gathering, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality function)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(term, has quality system)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(work, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(work, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(term, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(retreat, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(retreat, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(convention, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(term, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(caucus, has quality function)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(caucus, has quality function)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(caucus, has quality function)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(caucus, has quality function)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gathering, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(caucus, has quality function)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(convention, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(convention, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(retreat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(retreat, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(retreat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(retreat, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(conference, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(caucus, has quality function)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(caucus, has quality system)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(caucus, is originally function)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(caucus, is originally function)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(caucus, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(caucus, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(caucus, has quality system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality system)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(caucus, is originally function)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(caucus, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(caucus, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(caucus, is originally function)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(term, has quality system)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(convention, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(conference, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(retreat, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(retreat, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(term, has quality system)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(caucus, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)