caucus: has quality system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gathering
Weight: 0.48
, meeting
Weight: 0.45
, bill
Weight: 0.43
, term
Weight: 0.39
, work
Weight: 0.38
Siblings birthday party
Weight: 0.31
, convention
Weight: 0.31
, forum
Weight: 0.30
, retreat
Weight: 0.29
, conference
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality system 1.00
has quality good 0.84
has quality function 0.82
has quality bad 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality system)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(term, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality system)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality system)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality system)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gathering, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(term, has quality system)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(work, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(work, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(term, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(retreat, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(retreat, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(convention, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(term, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(caucus, has quality system)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(caucus, has quality system)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(caucus, has quality system)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(caucus, has quality system)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gathering, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(caucus, has quality system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(convention, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(convention, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(retreat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(retreat, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(retreat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(retreat, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(conference, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(caucus, has quality system)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality function)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(caucus, has quality function)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(caucus, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(caucus, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(caucus, has quality function)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality function)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(caucus, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(caucus, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(caucus, has quality system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(term, has quality system)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(convention, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(conference, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(retreat, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(retreat, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(term, has quality system)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(caucus, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)