cellular respiration: be more efficient than fermentation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.65
, function
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.57
, pathway
Weight: 0.54
, reaction
Weight: 0.50
Siblings phagocytosis
Weight: 0.35
, metabolism
Weight: 0.35
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.35
, digestion
Weight: 0.34
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more efficient than fermentation 1.00
produce more atp than fermentation 0.94
be different from fermentation 0.90
be preferred over fermentation 0.89
be more efficient than glycolysis 0.86
be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone 0.84
is more efficient 0.83
is efficient process 0.83
be considered efficient process 0.81
is efficient 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, is more efficient)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, is efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(metabolism, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(metabolism, is efficient)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(metabolism, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(metabolism, is more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, produce more atp than fermentation)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, produce more atp than fermentation)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, produce more atp than fermentation)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be different from fermentation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be different from fermentation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be different from fermentation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, produce more atp than fermentation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be different from fermentation)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be preferred over fermentation)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be preferred over fermentation)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, is efficient)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be preferred over fermentation)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be preferred over fermentation)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, is efficient)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, is efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(metabolism, is more efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(metabolism, is efficient)