cellular respiration: is more efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.65
, function
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.57
, pathway
Weight: 0.54
, reaction
Weight: 0.50
Siblings phagocytosis
Weight: 0.35
, metabolism
Weight: 0.35
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.35
, digestion
Weight: 0.34
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more efficient 1.00
is efficient 0.97
is efficient process 0.91
be considered efficient process 0.89
be more efficient than glycolysis 0.85
be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone 0.84
be more efficient than fermentation 0.83
be more important than product 0.77
be in solutions faster 0.77
is faster 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pathway, is faster)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(reaction, be in solutions faster)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, is more efficient)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(reaction, be in solutions faster)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(process, be more important than product)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pathway, is faster)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(reaction, be in solutions faster)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(pathway, is faster)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(process, be more important than product)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, is more efficient)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, is efficient)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pathway, is faster)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(reaction, be in solutions faster)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, is more efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(metabolism, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(metabolism, is more efficient)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(metabolism, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(metabolism, is efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, is more efficient)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, is efficient)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be considered more efficient than glycolysis alone)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, is efficient)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, is efficient)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be more efficient than fermentation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is efficient)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be considered efficient process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, is more efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(process, be more important than product)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(reaction, be in solutions faster)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pathway, is faster)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(metabolism, is efficient)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(metabolism, is more efficient)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(process, be more important than product)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(reaction, be in solutions faster)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(cellular respiration, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pathway, is faster)