ceramic: have low conductivity

Property	Similarity
have low conductivity	1.00
have conductivity	0.97
have low thermal conductivity	0.95
have thermal conductivity	0.92
is conductive	0.82
is good thermal insulators	0.78
is thermal insulators	0.78
is good electrical insulator	0.77
is electrical insulator	0.77
is good insulator	0.76

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(ceramic, have thermal conductivity)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, have low thermal conductivity)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(ceramic, have thermal conductivity)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is conductive)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(ceramic, have thermal conductivity)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, have thermal conductivity)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(ceramic, is conductive)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(ceramic, is conductive)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(ceramic, have low thermal conductivity)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Salient(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(ceramic, have low thermal conductivity)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(ceramic, is conductive)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(ceramic, have low thermal conductivity)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(ceramic, is good insulator)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good insulator)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(ceramic, have low conductivity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(ceramic, is good insulator)

Parents	medium Weight: 0.59 , alloy Weight: 0.59 , gift Weight: 0.59 , industry Weight: 0.58 , polymer Weight: 0.58
Siblings	silicon carbide Weight: 0.73 , resin Weight: 0.35 , acrylic Weight: 0.35 , plastic Weight: 0.35 , pottery Weight: 0.34

ceramic: have low conductivity

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings