ceramic: is good insulator

Related concepts

Parents	medium Weight: 0.59 , alloy Weight: 0.59 , gift Weight: 0.59 , industry Weight: 0.58 , polymer Weight: 0.58
Siblings	silicon carbide Weight: 0.73 , resin Weight: 0.35 , acrylic Weight: 0.35 , plastic Weight: 0.35 , pottery Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is good insulator	1.00
is bad insulator	0.99
is insulator	0.98
be used as insulator	0.96
is good electrical insulator	0.95
is electrical insulator	0.94
is good insulators	0.87
make good insulators	0.86
make insulators	0.84
is insulators	0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(polymer, is good insulators) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(ceramic, is good insulator)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(polymer, is insulators) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(ceramic, is good insulator)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(polymer, is insulators)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(polymer, is good insulators)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(polymer, is good insulators)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(polymer, is insulators)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulators)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(plastic, is insulators)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(plastic, is insulator)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(polymer, is good insulators) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good insulator)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(polymer, is insulators) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(plastic, is insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(plastic, is insulator)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(plastic, is good insulators) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(plastic, is good insulators)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(plastic, is insulators) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(plastic, is insulators)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(ceramic, is good insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(ceramic, is bad insulator)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Salient(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(ceramic, is insulator)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(ceramic, is good insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(polymer, is insulators)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(polymer, is good insulators)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(plastic, is insulator)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulator)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulators)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(plastic, is insulators)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(polymer, is insulators)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(ceramic, is good insulator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(polymer, is good insulators)