ceramic: is bad insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents medium
Weight: 0.59
, alloy
Weight: 0.59
, gift
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, polymer
Weight: 0.58
Siblings silicon carbide
Weight: 0.73
, resin
Weight: 0.35
, acrylic
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.35
, pottery
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad insulator 1.00
is good insulator 0.99
is insulator 0.98
be used as insulator 0.96
is good electrical insulator 0.94
is electrical insulator 0.93
is good insulators 0.85
make good insulators 0.85
is insulators 0.83
make insulators 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(polymer, is good insulators)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ceramic, is bad insulator)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(polymer, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ceramic, is bad insulator)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(polymer, is insulators)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(polymer, is good insulators)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(polymer, is good insulators)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(polymer, is insulators)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is insulator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulators)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is insulators)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(polymer, is good insulators)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(polymer, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(plastic, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(plastic, is insulator)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(plastic, is insulators)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(plastic, is good insulators)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good insulators)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(ceramic, is bad insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ceramic, is insulator)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ceramic, be used as insulator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is insulator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, make insulators)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(ceramic, make insulators)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(ceramic, be used as insulator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ceramic, make insulators)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ceramic, make insulators)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(ceramic, is insulators)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, make good insulators)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulators)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(ceramic, is insulators)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ceramic, make good insulators)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is insulators)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good insulators)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(ceramic, make good insulators)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ceramic, make good insulators)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(ceramic, is insulator)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good insulator)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(ceramic, is good insulators)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ceramic, be used as insulator)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ceramic, is good insulator)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be used as insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ceramic, is bad insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(polymer, is insulators)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(polymer, is good insulators)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic, is insulator)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulators)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is insulators)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(polymer, is insulators)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ceramic, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(polymer, is good insulators)