ceramic: is good insulators

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents medium
Weight: 0.59
, alloy
Weight: 0.59
, gift
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, polymer
Weight: 0.58
Siblings silicon carbide
Weight: 0.73
, resin
Weight: 0.35
, acrylic
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.35
, pottery
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good insulators 1.00
make good insulators 0.99
is insulators 0.98
make insulators 0.97
be used as insulators 0.96
be used as electrical insulators 0.94
is good thermal insulators 0.93
is thermal insulators 0.91
is good electrical insulator 0.87
is good insulator 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(polymer, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good insulators)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(polymer, is insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good insulators)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(polymer, is insulators)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(polymer, is good insulators)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(polymer, is good insulators)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(polymer, is insulators)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulators)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is insulators)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(polymer, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(polymer, is insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(plastic, is insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(plastic, is insulators)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(plastic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good insulators)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(ceramic, is good insulators)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(ceramic, be used as electrical insulators)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(ceramic, be used as electrical insulators)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(ceramic, be used as electrical insulators)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be used as electrical insulators)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ceramic, be used as insulators)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(ceramic, is insulators)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ceramic, make insulators)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(ceramic, make insulators)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ceramic, make insulators)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(ceramic, is insulators)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ceramic, make good insulators)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is insulators)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ceramic, be used as insulators)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(ceramic, be used as insulators)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, make insulators)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(ceramic, make good insulators)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ceramic, make good insulators)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulators)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, make good insulators)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be used as insulators)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good insulator)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good insulator)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ceramic, is good insulator)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good insulators)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(polymer, is insulators)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(polymer, is good insulators)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulators)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is insulators)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulator)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(polymer, is insulators)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ceramic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(polymer, is good insulators)