ceramic: is good electrical insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents medium
Weight: 0.59
, alloy
Weight: 0.59
, gift
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, polymer
Weight: 0.58
Siblings silicon carbide
Weight: 0.73
, resin
Weight: 0.35
, acrylic
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.35
, pottery
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good electrical insulator 1.00
is electrical insulator 0.99
is good insulator 0.95
is insulator 0.95
is bad insulator 0.94
be used as insulator 0.93
be used as electrical insulators 0.91
is good insulators 0.87
make good insulators 0.86
is good thermal insulators 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(polymer, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(polymer, is good insulators)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(polymer, is good insulators)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulators)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is insulator)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(polymer, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(plastic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(plastic, is insulator)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(plastic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good insulators)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(ceramic, be used as electrical insulators)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(ceramic, be used as electrical insulators)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be used as electrical insulators)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(ceramic, be used as electrical insulators)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(ceramic, is bad insulator)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ceramic, is insulator)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ceramic, be used as insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, make good insulators)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ceramic, is bad insulator)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is insulator)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(ceramic, be used as insulator)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(ceramic, make good insulators)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good insulator)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ceramic, make good insulators)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ceramic, make good insulators)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(ceramic, is insulator)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good insulators)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(ceramic, is good insulators)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ceramic, be used as insulator)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good insulator)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be used as insulator)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ceramic, is good insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(polymer, is good insulators)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic, is insulator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulators)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ceramic, is good electrical insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(polymer, is good insulators)