ceramic: is insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents medium
Weight: 0.59
, alloy
Weight: 0.59
, gift
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, polymer
Weight: 0.58
Siblings silicon carbide
Weight: 0.73
, resin
Weight: 0.35
, acrylic
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.35
, pottery
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is insulator 1.00
is good insulator 0.98
is bad insulator 0.98
be used as insulator 0.97
is electrical insulator 0.95
is good electrical insulator 0.95
is insulators 0.85
is good insulators 0.84
make insulators 0.84
be used as electrical insulators 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(polymer, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ceramic, is insulator)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(polymer, is insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ceramic, is insulator)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(polymer, is insulators)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(polymer, is good insulators)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(polymer, is good insulators)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(polymer, is insulators)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulators)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is insulators)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is insulator)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(polymer, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is insulator)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(polymer, is insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(plastic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(plastic, is insulator)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(plastic, is insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(plastic, is insulators)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(plastic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good insulators)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(ceramic, is insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is bad insulator)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(ceramic, is bad insulator)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulator)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(ceramic, be used as electrical insulators)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be used as electrical insulators)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(ceramic, be used as electrical insulators)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, make insulators)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be used as insulator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulators)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is bad insulator)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(ceramic, be used as electrical insulators)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(ceramic, make insulators)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ceramic, be used as insulator)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(ceramic, is insulators)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ceramic, be used as insulator)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(ceramic, be used as insulator)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good electrical insulator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ceramic, make insulators)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ceramic, is good insulator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is insulators)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(ceramic, is good insulators)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ceramic, is bad insulator)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good insulator)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ceramic, make insulators)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(ceramic, is insulators)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good insulator)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good insulators)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ceramic, is insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(polymer, is insulators)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(polymer, is good insulators)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic, is insulator)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulator)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulators)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is insulators)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(polymer, is insulators)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(ceramic, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(polymer, is good insulators)