chicken: be healthier than pork

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
Siblings broiler
Weight: 0.53
, dark meat
Weight: 0.42
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, fried egg
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be healthier than pork 1.00
be healthier than beef 0.93
be better than meat 0.88
be better than beef 0.85
be better than chicken 0.85
be better than red meat 0.85
be worse than meat 0.84
more is expensive than beef 0.83
be in meat 0.83
be cheaper than beef 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chicken, be healthier than pork)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(chicken, be healthier than pork)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(chicken, be healthier than pork)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than beef)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chicken, be in meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(chicken, be in meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(chicken, be in meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(chicken, be healthier than beef)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chicken, be healthier than beef)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(chicken, be healthier than beef)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be better than red meat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chicken, be better than meat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be in meat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be worse than meat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be better than meat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(chicken, be better than red meat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(chicken, be better than meat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(chicken, be worse than meat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chicken, be worse than meat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(chicken, be better than meat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(chicken, be worse than meat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(chicken, be better than red meat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chicken, be better than red meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than pork)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chicken, be healthier than pork)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(chicken, be healthier than pork)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)