chinchilla: be as pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.63
, rodent
Weight: 0.56
, species
Weight: 0.53
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.52
, pet
Weight: 0.52
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36
, alpaca
Weight: 0.35
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be as pets 1.00
make pets 0.96
is good pets 0.96
is bad pets 0.95
has state pets 0.95
is good pet 0.87
has state pet 0.85
be better than cats 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(guinea pig, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be as pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be as pets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, has state pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(boa constrictor, is good pets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(boa constrictor, has state pets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(guinea pig, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, be as pets)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, be as pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(boa constrictor, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(boa constrictor, is good pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(boa constrictor, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(boa constrictor, has state pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(chinchilla, be as pets)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chinchilla, make pets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(chinchilla, make pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(chinchilla, has state pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, make pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has state pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chinchilla, is good pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has state pets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(chinchilla, be better than cats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, be better than cats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, make pets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be better than cats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be better than cats)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chinchilla, is good pet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, is good pets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has state pet)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(chinchilla, is good pets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, is good pet)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has state pet)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(chinchilla, has state pet)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(chinchilla, is good pet)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be as pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(guinea pig, has state pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(boa constrictor, is good pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(boa constrictor, has state pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(chinchilla, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(guinea pig, has state pets)