chip: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.60
, substrate
Weight: 0.60
, fast food
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings potato chip
Weight: 0.73
, processor
Weight: 0.67
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.65
, cpu
Weight: 0.58
, motherboard
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be bad for children 0.81
be used on animals 0.81
be bad for humans 0.81
be bad for us 0.79
go bad 0.77
be tested without animals 0.76
be tested on animals 0.76
be bad for body 0.76
be bad for teenagers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(product, be tested on animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chip, be bad for dogs)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(product, be used on animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chip, be bad for dogs)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(product, be tested without animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chip, be bad for dogs)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chip, be bad for dogs)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chip, be bad for dogs)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for children)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for teenagers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(product, be used on animals)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for children)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for teenagers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(product, be tested without animals)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, go bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(product, be tested on animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(chip, be bad for dogs)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(product, be used on animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(chip, be bad for dogs)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(chip, be bad for dogs)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(chip, be bad for dogs)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(product, be tested without animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(chip, be bad for dogs)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be bad for dogs)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(motherboard, go bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(chip, be bad for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chip, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(product, be used on animals)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for children)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for teenagers)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(potato chip, be bad for dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(motherboard, go bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(potato chip, be bad for us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(product, be used on animals)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for children)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for teenagers)
...