circumcision: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.65
, ritual
Weight: 0.64
, law
Weight: 0.61
, surgery
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.60
Siblings female circumcision
Weight: 0.37
, vasectomy
Weight: 0.36
, hysterectomy
Weight: 0.35
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.35
, mastectomy
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
be just as bad as fgm 0.79
has quality sin 0.76
has quality jokes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(surgery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(circumcision, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ritual, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(circumcision, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(circumcision, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(circumcision, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ritual, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(surgery, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(surgery, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ritual, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality jokes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(vasectomy, has quality jokes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vasectomy, has quality sin)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(surgery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ritual, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(female circumcision, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(female circumcision, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, has quality jokes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(vasectomy, has quality sin)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(vasectomy, has quality sin)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(vasectomy, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(vasectomy, has quality jokes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(circumcision, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(circumcision, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(circumcision, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(circumcision, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(circumcision, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ritual, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(surgery, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, has quality jokes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(vasectomy, has quality sin)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(female circumcision, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(vasectomy, has quality jokes)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(female circumcision, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ritual, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(surgery, has quality good)