communication: be continued process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be continued process 1.00
be continued 0.92
be called process 0.80
has physical part process 0.80
be considered in two way process 0.76
be considered as process 0.76
be considered as multi-dimensional process 0.76
be described as process 0.76
be considered process 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(communication, be continued process)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(communication, has physical part process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered as process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(communication, be considered as process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(communication, be considered process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(communication, has physical part process)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered as process)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered process)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(communication, be considered as process)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(communication, be considered process)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(communication, has physical part process)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(communication, has physical part process)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(communication, be continued process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(communication, be continued process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(communication, be continued process)