communication: be important in public service

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in public service 1.00
be important in service 0.93
be customer service 0.81
be important for business 0.78
be important at work 0.78
be important for tcrm 0.77
be important in business 0.77
be with people important 0.77
be important in education 0.77
be important in organisation 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(department, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(communication, be important in public service)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(gap, be customer service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(communication, be important in public service)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(gap, be customer service)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(department, be important in organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(gap, be customer service)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(department, be important in organisation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(department, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in public service)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(gap, be customer service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in public service)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(communication, be important in public service)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(communication, be important at work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(communication, be important in business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(communication, be important in education)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(communication, be important at work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important at work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important in business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(communication, be important in education)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in education)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important at work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in education)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in public service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(communication, be important in public service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(gap, be customer service)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(gap, be customer service)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(communication, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)