corruption: be problem in countries

Related concepts

Parents	evil Weight: 0.64 , obstacle Weight: 0.61 , crime Weight: 0.61 , factor Weight: 0.61 , theme Weight: 0.59
Siblings	bribery Weight: 0.35 , terrorism Weight: 0.35 , fraud Weight: 0.34 , poverty Weight: 0.33 , hypocrisy Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be problem in countries	1.00
be problem in developing countries	0.94
be common in countries	0.84
has state problem	0.84
be problem in communities	0.83
be problem in united states	0.83
fear of is serious problem	0.80
is social problem	0.80
be seen as problem	0.79
be huge issue in states	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(evil, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in countries)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(crime, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in countries)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(crime, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in countries)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(crime, is social problem)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(crime, has state problem)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(evil, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(evil, has state problem)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(crime, has state problem)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(crime, is social problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(terrorism, has state problem)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(evil, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in countries)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(crime, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in countries)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(crime, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in countries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(poverty, has state problem)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(terrorism, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(terrorism, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(corruption, be problem in countries)

Similarity expansion

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.36

Salient(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(corruption, be problem in developing countries)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in developing countries)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(corruption, be common in countries)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(corruption, is social problem)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be common in countries)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(corruption, be common in countries)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(corruption, has state problem)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.36

Salient(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(corruption, be common in countries)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in developing countries)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(corruption, is social problem)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(corruption, has state problem)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.36

Salient(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(corruption, is social problem)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.36

Salient(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(corruption, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

Salient(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in countries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(evil, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(terrorism, has state problem)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(corruption, be problem in countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(evil, has state problem)