cut: get hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.59
, change
Weight: 0.58
, emergency
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chuck
Weight: 0.67
, loin
Weight: 0.62
, tenderloin
Weight: 0.54
, chop
Weight: 0.49
, flank
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
get hot 1.00
is hot 0.96
feel hot 0.92
exposed to things like hot sauce 0.81
be cooked in hot liquid 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tenderloin, is hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tenderloin, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tenderloin, is hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cut, get hot)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(cut, is hot)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cut, is hot)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cut, feel hot)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cut, feel hot)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cut, is hot)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cut, feel hot)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cut, feel hot)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cut, is hot)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cut, get hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cut, get hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cut, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tenderloin, is hot)