debt: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock
Weight: 0.64
, mortgage
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obligation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings creditor
Weight: 0.64
, equity
Weight: 0.64
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, borrowing
Weight: 0.59
, bondholder
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
be good 0.82
has quality worth 0.82
be bad for country 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
be bad for company 0.79
be good for business 0.76
be good for country 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mortgage, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(debt, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mortgage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(debt, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mortgage, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(debt, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mortgage, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(mortgage, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mortgage, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(mortgage, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mortgage, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mortgage, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(borrowing, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(borrowing, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mortgage, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(debt, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mortgage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(debt, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mortgage, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(debt, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(loan, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(equity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(equity, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(borrowing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(borrowing, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(equity, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(borrowing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(borrowing, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(debt, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(debt, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(debt, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(debt, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(debt, be bad for country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(debt, be bad for country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(debt, be bad for company)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(debt, be bad for company)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for company)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for company)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(debt, is bad thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(debt, is bad thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(debt, be good for country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(debt, be good for country)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(debt, be good for business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(debt, be good for country)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(debt, is bad thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(debt, be good for country)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for country)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for country)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(debt, be good for business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(debt, be good for country)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(debt, be good for country)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(debt, is bad thing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(debt, be good for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(debt, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(mortgage, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mortgage, has quality worth)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mortgage, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(loan, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(loan, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(equity, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(equity, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(borrowing, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(borrowing, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mortgage, has quality worth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(mortgage, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(debt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mortgage, has quality good)