dementia: has state concern

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental health problem
Weight: 0.71
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.71
, symptom
Weight: 0.66
, mental illness
Weight: 0.64
, illness
Weight: 0.63
Siblings bipolar disorder
Weight: 0.39
, epilepsy
Weight: 0.38
, schizophrenia
Weight: 0.38
, psychosis
Weight: 0.38
, eating disorder
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state concern 1.00
be issue of concern 0.92
has state problem 0.84
is national health priority 0.77
has state feel 0.76
is health priority 0.76
is health issue 0.75
is public health issue 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mental illness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dementia, has state concern)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(illness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dementia, has state concern)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(illness, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mental illness, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, has state problem)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(illness, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(schizophrenia, has state feel)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mental illness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(dementia, has state concern)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(illness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(dementia, has state concern)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(schizophrenia, has state feel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(schizophrenia, has state feel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(dementia, has state concern)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(dementia, be issue of concern)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be issue of concern)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(dementia, be issue of concern)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dementia, be issue of concern)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(dementia, is health issue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(dementia, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(dementia, is health issue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(dementia, has state problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(dementia, has state problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(dementia, is health priority)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(dementia, is public health issue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(dementia, is health issue)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(dementia, is health priority)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(dementia, is health priority)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dementia, is national health priority)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(dementia, is national health priority)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(dementia, is public health issue)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(dementia, is public health issue)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(dementia, is national health priority)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dementia, is national health priority)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(dementia, is health priority)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(dementia, is public health issue)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(dementia, is health issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state concern)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dementia, has state concern)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illness, has state problem)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mental illness, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(schizophrenia, has state feel)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(epilepsy, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illness, has state problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(dementia, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mental illness, has state problem)