electrician: need algebra

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.66
, mechanic
Weight: 0.64
, construction worker
Weight: 0.63
, craftsman
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.58
Siblings machinist
Weight: 0.37
, carpenter
Weight: 0.37
, office worker
Weight: 0.36
, auto mechanic
Weight: 0.36
, janitor
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
need algebra 1.00
use algebra 0.98
use math 0.87
use trigonometry 0.84
require school diploma 0.77
require high school diploma 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mechanic, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(electrician, need algebra)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(electrician, need algebra)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(electrician, need algebra)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(mechanic, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, use math)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(electrician, need algebra)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mechanic, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(electrician, need algebra)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(electrician, need algebra)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use algebra)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(carpenter, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use math)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(electrician, need algebra)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(electrician, use algebra)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electrician, use algebra)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(electrician, use math)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(electrician, use math)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use math)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(electrician, use trigonometry)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(electrician, use math)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(electrician, use trigonometry)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(electrician, use trigonometry)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use trigonometry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need algebra)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(electrician, need algebra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(mechanic, use math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(carpenter, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(carpenter, use trigonometry)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(electrician, need algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(mechanic, use math)