extinction: is thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents catastrophe
Weight: 0.53
, concept
Weight: 0.52
, process
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.49
, topic
Weight: 0.49
Siblings overpopulation
Weight: 0.31
, starvation
Weight: 0.31
, evolution
Weight: 0.31
, global warming
Weight: 0.31
, speciation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is thing 1.00
is good thing 0.95
is bad thing 0.94
be such as thing 0.87
be such as big thing 0.85
be necessary aspect of evolution 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evolution, is good thing)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is thing)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(starvation, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(starvation, is thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(overpopulation, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(evolution, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(extinction, is thing)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is good thing)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is bad thing)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be such as thing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be such as big thing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(extinction, be such as thing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(extinction, be such as big thing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(extinction, be such as thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(extinction, be such as thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(extinction, be such as big thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(extinction, is good thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be necessary aspect of evolution)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(extinction, is bad thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(extinction, is good thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(extinction, is bad thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(extinction, be necessary aspect of evolution)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(extinction, be necessary aspect of evolution)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(extinction, is bad thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(extinction, is good thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(extinction, be necessary aspect of evolution)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(extinction, be such as big thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(extinction, is thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(starvation, is thing)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is thing)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(starvation, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evolution, is good thing)