foam: is good insulators

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.56
, composition
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
, surface
Weight: 0.55
, filler
Weight: 0.52
Siblings latex
Weight: 0.60
, styrofoam
Weight: 0.58
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, silicone
Weight: 0.33
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good insulators 1.00
is insulators 0.98
have good heat insulators glass 0.93
have heat insulators glass 0.92
is good insulator 0.87
make good insulator 0.86
is bad insulator 0.85
is good sound insulator 0.85
is better insulator 0.85
be used as insulator 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, make good insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good sound insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be used as insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fiberglass, be used as insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, be used as insulator)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good sound insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good sound insulator)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fiberglass, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is good insulator)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good insulator)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(styrofoam, make good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, make good insulator)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(foam, is good insulators)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(foam, have heat insulators glass)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(foam, have heat insulators glass)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(foam, is insulators)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(foam, have good heat insulators glass)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(foam, have heat insulators glass)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(foam, have good heat insulators glass)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(foam, have good heat insulators glass)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(foam, is insulators)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(foam, is insulators)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(foam, have good heat insulators glass)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(foam, have heat insulators glass)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(foam, is good sound insulator)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(foam, is bad insulator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(foam, is good insulator)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(foam, is good sound insulator)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(foam, is bad insulator)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(foam, is good sound insulator)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(foam, is good insulator)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(foam, is bad insulator)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good sound insulator)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulators)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(foam, is good insulators)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be used as insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good sound insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(styrofoam, make good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good insulator)