foam: is insulators

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.56
, composition
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
, surface
Weight: 0.55
, filler
Weight: 0.52
Siblings latex
Weight: 0.60
, styrofoam
Weight: 0.58
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, silicone
Weight: 0.33
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is insulators 1.00
is good insulators 0.98
have heat insulators glass 0.92
have good heat insulators glass 0.92
is insulator 0.85
be used as insulator 0.84
is good insulator 0.84
make insulator 0.84
is bad insulator 0.83
is better insulator 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is good insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be used as insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, make insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(styrofoam, make insulator)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, make insulator)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(styrofoam, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is insulator)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(fiberglass, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is insulator)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fiberglass, be used as insulator)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, be used as insulator)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fiberglass, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is good insulator)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good insulator)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(foam, is insulators)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(foam, have heat insulators glass)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(foam, have heat insulators glass)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(foam, have heat insulators glass)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(foam, have good heat insulators glass)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(foam, have good heat insulators glass)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(foam, have good heat insulators glass)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulators)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(foam, have heat insulators glass)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(foam, is insulator)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(foam, have good heat insulators glass)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(foam, is insulator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(foam, is good insulators)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(foam, is good insulators)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(foam, is good insulators)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(foam, is insulator)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(foam, is bad insulator)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(foam, is good insulator)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(foam, is bad insulator)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulator)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(foam, is bad insulator)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(foam, is good insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulators)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(foam, is insulators)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(styrofoam, make insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be used as insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is good insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good insulator)