french restaurant: be at nice part of town

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.76
, place
Weight: 0.57
, must
Weight: 0.48
, food
Weight: 0.45
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at nice part of town 1.00
be at britsh town 0.86
be at town 0.86
be at large town 0.84
be nice to eat 0.82
be at big city 0.82
be good 0.77
be at any big north american city 0.77
be one kind of eat place 0.77
be at large city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(restaurant, be one kind of eat place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(place, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(place, be at town)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at big city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at town)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(food, be good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be one kind of eat place)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at town)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at big city)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(place, be at town)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be one kind of eat place)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large town)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at any big north american city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(place, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(restaurant, be one kind of eat place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at large town)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at any big north american city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at any big north american city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at big city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(restaurant, be one kind of eat place)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(place, be at town)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at town)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at big city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at large town)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at any big north american city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(restaurant, be one kind of eat place)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(place, be at town)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at town)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(french restaurant, be at nice part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at big city)