indian restaurant: be at large city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, place
Weight: 0.54
, food
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at large city 1.00
be at any large city 0.94
be at large town 0.92
be at big city 0.90
be at city 0.88
be at many city 0.87
be at major city 0.85
be at downtown area 0.81
be at any big north american city 0.80
be at most city in world 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(restaurant, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(food, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(place, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(place, be at city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at big city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(food, be at city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at big city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food, be at city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(place, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large town)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at any big north american city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at downtown area)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(restaurant, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(food, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(place, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at large town)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at downtown area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at downtown area)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at any big north american city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at any big north american city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be at large city)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at big city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(place, be at city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(food, be at city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at large town)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at downtown area)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at any big north american city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at big city)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(place, be at city)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(food, be at city)